Journal Articles
Lemon, L. L., & VanDyke, M. S. (in press). Pandemic problems in the ivory tower: Exploring employee engagement and burnout during the COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Strategic Communication.
Lemon, L. L., & VanDyke, M. S. (in press). Addressing grand challenges: Perceptions of interdisciplinary research and how internal communication structures facilitate interdisciplinary research at U.S. research-intensive universities. Journal of Communication Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-04-2022-0035
VanDyke, M. S., Lee, N. M., Abitbol, A., & Rush, S. (2023). How message appeals and prior product use influence information processing, risk perceptions, trust, attitudes, and genetic test purchase intentions. PLoS ONE, 18(3), e0283102. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283102
Abitbol, A., Lee, N. M., & VanDyke, M. S. (2022). Examining the transparency of DTC genetic testing company communication and its impact on consumer trust, attitude and behavioral intentions. Journal of Communication Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-01-2022-0006
VanDyke, M. S., Britt, B. C., Britt, R. K., & Franco, C. L. (2022). How environment-focused communities discuss COVID-19 online: An analysis of social (risk) amplification and ripple effects on Reddit. Environmental Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2056222
VanDyke, M. S., Armstrong, C. L., & Bareford, K. J. (2021). How stakeholders adopt and share flood forecast information: A survey of Mississippi River outlook users. Journal of Extreme Events, 8, 2150011. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345737621500111
Lemon, L. L., & VanDyke, M. S. (2021). Expanding the discussion on internal management of risk communication: A critique of the current risk communication literature. Public Relations Inquiry, 10, 377-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X211014086
VanDyke, M. S., Armstrong, C. L., & Bareford, K. J. (2021). How risk decision-makers interpret and use flood forecast information: Assessing the Mississippi River outlook email product. Journal of Risk Research, 24, 1239-1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1819390
VanDyke, M. S., & Lee, N. M. (2020). Science public relations: The parallel, interwoven, and contrasting trajectories of public relations and science communication theory and practice. Public Relations Review, 46, 101953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101953
Lee, N. M., Abitbol, A., & VanDyke, M. S. (2020). Science communication meets consumer relations: An analysis of Twitter use by 23andMe. Science Communication, 42, 244-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020914906
VanDyke, M. S., & King, A. J. (2020). Dialogic communication practices of water district officials: Insights from practitioner interviews. Environmental Communication, 14, 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1705365
Hahn, D., VanDyke, M. S., Cummins, R. G. (2018). It’s a numbers game: Change in frequency, type, and presentation form of statistics used in NFL broadcasts. International Journal of Sport Communication, 11, 482-502. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2018-0107
VanDyke, M. S., & Callison, C. (2018). Using continuous response and self-report measures to understand spokesperson evaluation processes during water crises. Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education, 164, 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2018.03285.x
VanDyke, M. S., & King, A. J. (2018). Using the CAUSE model to understand public communication about water risks: Perspectives from Texas groundwater district officials on drought and availability. Risk Analysis, 38, 1378-1389. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12950
Sarge, M. A., Daggett, S., & VanDyke, M. S. (2018). Using theory to inform water conservation in business communities: Formative research from a chamber initiative. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 17, 198-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2017.1395717
Lee, N. M., VanDyke, M. S., & Cummins, R. G. (2018). A missed opportunity?: NOAA’s use of social media to communicate climate science. Environmental Communication, 12, 274-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1269825
Herring, J., VanDyke, M. S., Cummins, R. G., & Melton, F. (2017). Communicating local climate risks online through an interactive data visualization. Environmental Communication, 11, 90-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1176946
VanDyke, M. S., & Tedesco, J. C. (2016). Understanding green content strategies: An analysis of environmental advertising frames from 1990 to 2010. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10, 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2015.1066379
Merle, P., Gearhart, S., Craig, C., VanDyke, M., Brooks, M. E., & Rahimi, M. (2015). Computers, tablets, and smart phones: The truth about web-based surveys. Survey Practice, 8. Available online: http://www.surveypractice.org/index.php/SurveyPractice/article/view/254/html_45.
Sarge, M. A., VanDyke, M. S., King, A. J., & White, S. R. (2015). Selective perceptions of hydraulic fracturing: The role of issue support in the evaluation of visual frames. Politics and the Life Sciences, 34, 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2015.6
Lee, N. M., & VanDyke, M. S. (2015). Set it and forget it: The one-way use of social media by government agencies communicating science. Science Communication, 37, 533-541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015588600
Lemon, L. L., & VanDyke, M. S. (in press). Addressing grand challenges: Perceptions of interdisciplinary research and how internal communication structures facilitate interdisciplinary research at U.S. research-intensive universities. Journal of Communication Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-04-2022-0035
VanDyke, M. S., Lee, N. M., Abitbol, A., & Rush, S. (2023). How message appeals and prior product use influence information processing, risk perceptions, trust, attitudes, and genetic test purchase intentions. PLoS ONE, 18(3), e0283102. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283102
Abitbol, A., Lee, N. M., & VanDyke, M. S. (2022). Examining the transparency of DTC genetic testing company communication and its impact on consumer trust, attitude and behavioral intentions. Journal of Communication Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-01-2022-0006
VanDyke, M. S., Britt, B. C., Britt, R. K., & Franco, C. L. (2022). How environment-focused communities discuss COVID-19 online: An analysis of social (risk) amplification and ripple effects on Reddit. Environmental Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2056222
VanDyke, M. S., Armstrong, C. L., & Bareford, K. J. (2021). How stakeholders adopt and share flood forecast information: A survey of Mississippi River outlook users. Journal of Extreme Events, 8, 2150011. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345737621500111
Lemon, L. L., & VanDyke, M. S. (2021). Expanding the discussion on internal management of risk communication: A critique of the current risk communication literature. Public Relations Inquiry, 10, 377-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X211014086
VanDyke, M. S., Armstrong, C. L., & Bareford, K. J. (2021). How risk decision-makers interpret and use flood forecast information: Assessing the Mississippi River outlook email product. Journal of Risk Research, 24, 1239-1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1819390
VanDyke, M. S., & Lee, N. M. (2020). Science public relations: The parallel, interwoven, and contrasting trajectories of public relations and science communication theory and practice. Public Relations Review, 46, 101953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101953
Lee, N. M., Abitbol, A., & VanDyke, M. S. (2020). Science communication meets consumer relations: An analysis of Twitter use by 23andMe. Science Communication, 42, 244-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020914906
VanDyke, M. S., & King, A. J. (2020). Dialogic communication practices of water district officials: Insights from practitioner interviews. Environmental Communication, 14, 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1705365
Hahn, D., VanDyke, M. S., Cummins, R. G. (2018). It’s a numbers game: Change in frequency, type, and presentation form of statistics used in NFL broadcasts. International Journal of Sport Communication, 11, 482-502. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2018-0107
VanDyke, M. S., & Callison, C. (2018). Using continuous response and self-report measures to understand spokesperson evaluation processes during water crises. Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education, 164, 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2018.03285.x
VanDyke, M. S., & King, A. J. (2018). Using the CAUSE model to understand public communication about water risks: Perspectives from Texas groundwater district officials on drought and availability. Risk Analysis, 38, 1378-1389. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12950
Sarge, M. A., Daggett, S., & VanDyke, M. S. (2018). Using theory to inform water conservation in business communities: Formative research from a chamber initiative. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 17, 198-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2017.1395717
Lee, N. M., VanDyke, M. S., & Cummins, R. G. (2018). A missed opportunity?: NOAA’s use of social media to communicate climate science. Environmental Communication, 12, 274-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1269825
Herring, J., VanDyke, M. S., Cummins, R. G., & Melton, F. (2017). Communicating local climate risks online through an interactive data visualization. Environmental Communication, 11, 90-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1176946
VanDyke, M. S., & Tedesco, J. C. (2016). Understanding green content strategies: An analysis of environmental advertising frames from 1990 to 2010. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10, 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2015.1066379
Merle, P., Gearhart, S., Craig, C., VanDyke, M., Brooks, M. E., & Rahimi, M. (2015). Computers, tablets, and smart phones: The truth about web-based surveys. Survey Practice, 8. Available online: http://www.surveypractice.org/index.php/SurveyPractice/article/view/254/html_45.
Sarge, M. A., VanDyke, M. S., King, A. J., & White, S. R. (2015). Selective perceptions of hydraulic fracturing: The role of issue support in the evaluation of visual frames. Politics and the Life Sciences, 34, 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2015.6
Lee, N. M., & VanDyke, M. S. (2015). Set it and forget it: The one-way use of social media by government agencies communicating science. Science Communication, 37, 533-541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015588600
Book Chapters
VanDyke, M. S., & Lee, N. M. (2022). Issues management in science and technology: Contestable matters of fact, value and policy, and areas for future research. In B. I. Newman & T. P. Newman (Eds.), A research agenda for political marketing. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800377202.00011
Horsley, J. S., & VanDyke, M. S. (2021). Crisis communication challenges in the public sector. In M. Lee, G. Neeley, & K. Stewart (Eds.), The practice of government public relations (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Waggenspack, B. M., & VanDyke, M. (2016). Ashley Judd’s indictment of mountaintop removal coal mining: A stain on the conscience of America. In R. D. Besel, & R. K. Duffy (Eds.), Green voices: Defending nature and the environment in American civil discourse. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Gardner, L., Wilkinson, K. T., Merle, P. F., Luo, Y., Rahimi, M., Cui, B., Rybalko, S., & VanDyke, M. (2016). Press coverage of the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election: A multinational, cross-language comparison. In C. Bieber & K. Kamps (Eds.), Die US-Präsidentschaftswahl 2012: Analysen der Politik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft (The United States Presidential Election 2012: Political and Communication Science Analyses) (pp. 241-268). Berlin: Springer VS.
Horsley, J. S., & VanDyke, M. S. (2021). Crisis communication challenges in the public sector. In M. Lee, G. Neeley, & K. Stewart (Eds.), The practice of government public relations (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Waggenspack, B. M., & VanDyke, M. (2016). Ashley Judd’s indictment of mountaintop removal coal mining: A stain on the conscience of America. In R. D. Besel, & R. K. Duffy (Eds.), Green voices: Defending nature and the environment in American civil discourse. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Gardner, L., Wilkinson, K. T., Merle, P. F., Luo, Y., Rahimi, M., Cui, B., Rybalko, S., & VanDyke, M. (2016). Press coverage of the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election: A multinational, cross-language comparison. In C. Bieber & K. Kamps (Eds.), Die US-Präsidentschaftswahl 2012: Analysen der Politik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft (The United States Presidential Election 2012: Political and Communication Science Analyses) (pp. 241-268). Berlin: Springer VS.
Other Publications
Lee, N. M., VanDyke, M. S., & Cummins, R. G. (2018). A Reply to Lindsey, Herring, and Greenhalgh on “A Missed Opportunity?: NOAA’s Use of Social Media to Communicate Climate Science.” Environmental Communication, 12, 287-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1415422
Zhang, W., & VanDyke, M. S. (2018). Association versus causation. In L. A. Schintler & C. L. McNeely (Eds.), Encyclopedia of big data. Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32001-4_15-1
Zhang, W., & VanDyke, M. S. (2018). Association versus causation. In L. A. Schintler & C. L. McNeely (Eds.), Encyclopedia of big data. Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32001-4_15-1